Thursday, September 20, 2012

Ann Coulter’s new book on racial issues

Ann Coulter speaks at Truman State University, Thursday, April 12, 2012 in Kirksville, Mo. | AP PhotoAnn Coulter’s latest book — “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama” — comes out on Sept. 25, just weeks ahead of Election Day, but it’s not the kind of tome you’d expect from the conservative firebrand.
Mitt Romney, for instance, isn’t mentioned at all. And, although much of the 336-page book discusses President Barack Obama (and Democrats, generally), it also takes a trip down memory lane, exploring events in our nation’s racial history as far back as the Civil War.

Dedicated to “the freest black man in America,” Coulter’s “Mugged,” published by Sentinel/Penguin Group USA, is an exploration of the idea that, as she puts it, “the entire history of civil rights consists of Republicans battling Democrats to guarantee the constitutional rights of black people.”(Of slavery, Coulter calls it “a policy defended to the death of Democrats,” for instance).
On the issue of current events, much of Coulter’s criticism of the president centers on his willingness to allow “others to make despicable racial smears on his behalf.”
“As the New York Times described Obama’s typical campaign strategy back in 2008: ‘This has been [campaign manager David] Axelrod’s career, an eternal return to Chicago and to the politics of race.’”

“Obama has repeatedly returned to the well of racial divisiveness to serve his political ends,” Coulter writes. “His 2008 presidential campaign managed to revive the white guilt that had long since dissipated, and then hinted that the one path to racial reconciliation was to make him president. Only then could we stop talking about race — a conversation he had initiated in the first place.”
“He was a dream come true for liberal elites: They could indulge in self-righteousness on race and get a hardcare leftie into the White House at the same time!”
Coulter even takes on Obama’s biography: “Obama’s childhood consisted of a Beverly Hills, 90210 existence at the prestigious Punahou School in Honolulu (2006 winner of ‘greenest’ school in America!). And yet he still managed to develop a racial hair trigger. Reading about Obama’s race fixation in the middle of suburban banality is akin to reading Hitler’s obsessive musing on his Germanic identity.”
Obama’s one-time pastor and friend, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, also figures prominently in Coulter’s discussion of race and the Democratic Party.

Bill Maher: Mitt Romney is like a ‘movie monster’

Liberal comedian Bill Maher couldn’t wait until his HBO show Friday to display his disgust with GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s comments on the “47 percent,” using Twitter on Wednesday to call the donors at the closed-door fundraiser “douchebags” and the candidate a “loser.”
Maher, who gave $1 million to a super PAC backing President Barack Obama’s reelection, has already declared that Romney lost the election, and previously labeled Mormonism a “cult.”

Watching . He's like every movie monster who ever ate a city or sliced a teenager - the more glimpses u get of him the phonier he looks

: this is getting like a game where your team is winning but the other team is so lame the game sucks - told ya he was a loser!

These douchebags at Mitt's Boca Q and A...every time I try to stop hating Republicans...THEY PULL ME BACK IN!

Deciphering Mitt Romney's '47 percent' blunder

The best defense of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s instantly notorious “47 percent” remarks at a May fundraiser is that he made a bad point badly.
Romney mixed up three separate groups of people: the roughly half the country that will inevitably support President Barack Obama, the half that doesn’t pay federal income taxes and the half that receives government benefits. Then he declared them all a collective lost cause. He will never win them over, or convince them to take responsibility for their lives. Next question.

In reality, these are three distinct groups. Many Obama supporters are rich. Indeed, we can be fairly certain all the attendees at the president’s fundraiser with BeyoncĂ© and Jay-Z in New York City the other day have hefty tax bills. Meanwhile, many of Romney’s supporters — especially the elderly — don’t pay federal income taxes and receive government benefits.
As a political scientist, Romney is an excellent former governor of Massachusetts.
Romney didn’t come up with this construct on his own, however. On taxes, he was repeating a conservative talking point about the perils of 47 percent of the people not paying federal income taxes — though to be precise, 46.4 percent of “tax units” don’t pay income taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center. Romney took this line of argument and blundered his way through it.

George Will says Romney speaks conservatism as a second language. At times, he sounds like the English-speaking German in a World War II movie who’s infiltrated American lines and is asked who won the World Series. Even if he memorized the answer, he sure as hell can’t tell you anything about Stan Musial.
But the point Romney messed up isn’t particularly convincing to begin with — though it has been made by serious conservatives, like Romney’s own running mate Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan . The argument is that if people aren’t paying federal income taxes, they are essentially freeloaders who will vote themselves more government benefits knowing that they don’t have to pay for them.
As my colleague Ramesh Ponnuru has pointed out, there’s no evidence for this dynamic. It is true that the number of people without a federal income tax liability is up — it was just 28 percent in 1950. It is mainly the poor, seniors and lower-income families with children who don’t owe income taxes. The poor lean heavily Democratic, but that’s always been so. Seniors, meanwhile, have been swinging Republican, and there’s no indication that families with children are becoming more liberal.

George Will says Romney speaks conservatism as a second language. At times, he sounds like the English-speaking German in a World War II movie who’s infiltrated American lines and is asked who won the World Series. Even if he memorized the answer, he sure as hell can’t tell you anything about Stan Musial.
But the point Romney messed up isn’t particularly convincing to begin with — though it has been made by serious conservatives, like Romney’s own running mate Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan . The argument is that if people aren’t paying federal income taxes, they are essentially freeloaders who will vote themselves more government benefits knowing that they don’t have to pay for them.
As my colleague Ramesh Ponnuru has pointed out, there’s no evidence for this dynamic. It is true that the number of people without a federal income tax liability is up — it was just 28 percent in 1950. It is mainly the poor, seniors and lower-income families with children who don’t owe income taxes. The poor lean heavily Democratic, but that’s always been so. Seniors, meanwhile, have been swinging Republican, and there’s no indication that families with children are becoming more liberal.

George Will says Romney speaks conservatism as a second language. At times, he sounds like the English-speaking German in a World War II movie who’s infiltrated American lines and is asked who won the World Series. Even if he memorized the answer, he sure as hell can’t tell you anything about Stan Musial.
But the point Romney messed up isn’t particularly convincing to begin with — though it has been made by serious conservatives, like Romney’s own running mate Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan . The argument is that if people aren’t paying federal income taxes, they are essentially freeloaders who will vote themselves more government benefits knowing that they don’t have to pay for them.
As my colleague Ramesh Ponnuru has pointed out, there’s no evidence for this dynamic. It is true that the number of people without a federal income tax liability is up — it was just 28 percent in 1950. It is mainly the poor, seniors and lower-income families with children who don’t owe income taxes. The poor lean heavily Democratic, but that’s always been so. Seniors, meanwhile, have been swinging Republican, and there’s no indication that families with children are becoming more liberal.

By RICH LOWRY

Democrats surge in key Senate campaigns

Democratic candidates in some of the most critical Senate races in the country are surging, putting the party in its best position of the election cycle to keep its majority in November.
The reasons range from the post-convention bounce led by President Barack Obama, to potent Democratic attack ads, to anemic performances of some GOP candidates.

Fresh polling in marquee contests shows a distinct trend line in the Democrats’ favor, making the GOP’s narrow path to a Senate majority significantly more difficult with less than two months until the election.

Democratic candidates in Virginia, Massachusetts and Wisconsin are on the rise after navigating a summer of challenges, and benefiting from Obama’s growing strength in all three states. In Florida and Ohio, Democratic incumbents have so far withstood a tidal wave of spending by conservative super PACs and outside groups.
Senate Democrats said Wednesday that stumbles by Republican Senate candidates, infighting between the tea party movement and establishment wings of the GOP and effective Democratic ads have all helped their cause. The Democratic convention, they say, firmed up the party’s base.
“Obama’s convention bounce is going to — in the short term — make taking the Senate majority look near impossible for a little bit,” acknowledged one top GOP strategist.
Democrats came into the cycle defending 23 seats, versus only 10 for Republicans. Obama and the Democrats had taken a historic beatdown in the 2010 midterm elections, and the president was polling behind Senate Democratic candidates and incumbents in key swing states. Many in the party feared an unpopular president combined with a bad economy would cost the party the White House and the Senate.
The race for the Senate is far from over, but those fears are nowhere near as acute seven weeks out from the election.
Obama is far stronger, especially in battleground states. And Sen. Olympia Snowe’s (R-Maine) decision to retire was a huge gift, putting a safe GOP seat into play.
“A year and a half ago, no one gave us a shot at all of being in the majority after November,” said Washington Sen. Patty Murray, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. “We have increased the odds dramatically.”
Added Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.): “The chances are very, very strong that we will keep the Senate, and it’s certainly within the realm of realistic possibility we won’t lose net seats.”

Romney rescue plan

BOSTON — More Mitt.
After taking a beating for comments he privately wishes he never made and from conservative critics he wishes he could muzzle, Mitt Romney and his campaign are settling on a rescue plan to show more of him — in ads, speeches and campaign appearances. A big focus, according to campaign officials, will be on Romney talking a lot more about how his ideas will help regular Americans who remain deeply suspicious of him

“He has to own his message for people, especially women, to buy the messenger,” one top adviser said.
A campaign official said: “In a lot of the current survey data, there’s a desire among the electorate to know more about Mitt in terms of how he would lead. Over the next six weeks, the campaign is going to provide a lot more of that.”
Aides also expect more joint appearances by Romney and running mate Paul Ryan – most likely in the swing states of Ohio, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The plan, described by top aides and advisers in interviews this week, is an acknowledgment that Romney is in enough of a hole that he cannot depend on the presidential debates to turn his candidacy around. In fact, Romney, who recently did five mock debates in a 48-hour period to practice, has confided to advisers that it may be hard to win a debate because every attack against President Barack Obama will seem stale while the attacks on him will seem fresher and newsier to a hostile media.
Instead, Romney plans to dial back on fundraisers and vastly increase his personal appearances — on the stump and in ads — to convince what’s left of the undecided voters that Obama has been a disappointment and that he has a specific plan that is less risky than the status quo.
Rather than talk about the broader economy, Romney will increasingly talk about his plans in terms of the effect on families, the aides said. This started before the Republican convention, when he boiled his 59-point plan for the national economy down to a five-point “Plan for a Stronger Middle Class.”
The emerging strategy comes after several days of soul-searching. Romney officials are very clear-eyed about the damage done by two straight weeks of bad media coverage and the embarrassing comments caught on tape (see below for their assessment of what hurt the most in the past 10 days). They don’t dispute they are locked in serious turbulence, but they also take solace that things are not worse after what they consider the darkest stretch of the campaign.
“We are going to look back at this as the week he got his act together, or the beginning of the end,” said a top Republican who works closely with the campaign.
The campaign is moving fast to calm nerves, especially among donors. To get a flavor of the challenge before them, a top donor said that after Romney spoke at a fundraising breakfast at the Hilton New York on Friday, a will-Mitt-win poll was taken at one table of 10 men, each of whom had paid at least $2,500 to attend, and some of whom had raised as much as $50,000 for the campaign. Not a single man said yes


n first debate, Scott Brown hits Elizabeth Warren on Cherokee claim

BOSTON — Republican Sen. Scott Brown wasted no time lacing into Elizabeth Warren over her controversial claim of Native American heritage Thursday night, attempting to reignite broader questions about her character during the first debate of their fiercely contested Senate campaign.
Brown took the first question of the hour-long face-off to yank the scab off a controversy that wounded Warren’s campaign last spring, when it was revealed she identified herself as a minority while serving as a university professor.

Scott Brown, left, and Elizabeth Warren are pictured. | AP Photo“Professor Warren claimed that she was a Native American, a person of color and as you can see, she’s not,” said Brown, who repeatedly called on Warren to release her personnel records to put to rest whether the claim helped her gain employment at Harvard University or the University of Pennsylvania. “When you are a U.S. Senator, you have to pass a test and that’s one of character and honesty and truthfulness. I believe and others believe she’s failed that test.”
Warren denied ever using her Cherokee status to get into college or law school and invoked her family in defense.
“The people who hired me have spoken and they’ve been clear about it,” Warren said at the debate, hosted by CBS affiliate WBZ. “I didn’t get an advantage because of my background. But this is about family. I can’t and won’t change who I am. I am who I am.

Undeterred, Brown went back a third time at Warren. “You refuse to release your records and I think that speaks volumes,” he said.
The exchange at the outset set the tone for a testy debate, Brown consistently addressed Warren as “professor” and Warren attempted to dent the incumbent’s image as an independent who bucks the party line.
The two also sparred over tax cuts for the wealthy, oil subsidies and their philosophies on confirming Supreme Court nominees.
When Warren took a shot at Brown for voting against the nomination of Justice Elena Kagan, she framed the vote in grandiose terms.
“This really may be the race for the control of the Senate and the Supreme Court may hang in the balance,” she said.
After trailing Brown in summer polling, Warren is riding a wave of fresh momentum out of the Democratic National Convention.
Of the five public polls taken since the convention, Warren led in four of them by a range of 2 to 6 percentage points. Only a UMass/Boston Herald survey published Thursday gave Brown the upper hand by 4 points.

Earlier in the day in Washington, Brown raised the prospect that he might miss the first of their debate because of votes, but he later caught an afternoon flight back home.
The two candidates will face off next Oct. 1 at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell.